The Hub
Lite members only
Unlock video
Marketing Club: The Miracle of ManyChat
Lite members only
Unlock video
Acoustic Guitar Builders Club: Brace Yourself
Lite members only
Unlock video
3D Club: Node Atlas with Brett Bailey
feedback on Les Paul Headstock repair
Celluloid Chronicles Ep. 2 - Chet Atkins Nashville
Finish Chip Repair help.... Black fill n' finish?
Bridge Reglue Suggestions...
Magician Performs Guitar Pick Card Magic Trick | Penn & Teller: Fool Us
Lite members only
Unlock video
Electric Guitar Builders Club: Frank Brothers Guitar Company
Anyone know where I can find a Thumbwheel tone control assembly like this?
Sterling Maj200xsm - Tunning issues
bozo B80/12 neck block clownery
Dude Built A Rotary Speaker
New Feature - Connect Automatically
D28 blowout
Tonewood for sale northeastern Nevada
Lite members only
Unlock video
3D Club: Strings Micro Factory with Brad Combs
One Low Fret: Replace the fret vs. re-level the entire board
There's a video on YouTube from Chris @ Highline Guitars who wants about "proper use of a fret rocker": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5swQMVDYaiQ
One thing that surprised me in the video was his suggestion that "your best option to deal with a single low fret is to re-level the entire board." I commented "Why don't you just replace/crown the low fret instead of taking the time to re-level/crown the entire board?" His claim that "it takes more time to replace the one fret" doesn't seem logical. Re-crowning and polishing the entire board takes an enormous amount of time compared to doing one fret. The only potential justification for his statement I could come up with is "it may take more time to find exactly matching fret wire than to recrown the entire board."
Thoughts?
Tim Henrion - Palm Coast, FL - Desciple of the 'Church of Erlewine'
